Denver Court Gun Case Motion for Default JudgementIN THE DENVER DISTRICT COURT
Case No.: Trial Court 01 GS 606306
People of the State of Colorado, Inc.
VERIFIED MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGEMENT
Defendant, Richard Stanley, without assistance of counsel, submits this Verified Motion for Default Judgment to the pleading standard described in Haines v Kerner 404 U.S. 519-521
and relies on the Court to explain any deficiency concerning Defendant?s pleadings as outlined in Platsky v C.I.A. 953 F. 2d 25. Additional, pro se litigant is to be given reasonable
opportunity to remedy the defects in his pleadings. Reynoldson v Shillinger 907 F. 2d (10th Cir) See also Jaxon v Circle K. Corp. 773F. 2d 1138, 1140 (10th Cir. Cir. 1985)
I Richard, ?Rick? Stanley, a man with actual knowledge, request judicial notice be taken of the following information, who also verifies under penalty of perjury that the below stated
Affidavit is true and correct
The venue of 01 GS is correct.
The Appellant/Defendant is not an infant, incompetent, or officer or agency of the State of Colorado or in the military service.
The damages sought in violation of my unalienable rights are $1,000,000 dollars each for a total of $15,000,000 dollars, attached.
The name of party to whom judgment is to be granted is Richard ?Rick? Stanley.
The name of party to who judgment is to be taken is the City of Denver, Inc.
Venue has been considered and is proper.
The party against whom judgment is to be taken is not in the military service.
Email Rick Stanley at