RX FOR CONTROL

From:

RX FOR CONTROL

http://www.newswithviews.com/Mary/starrett17.htm

RX FOR CONTROL

By Mary Starrett

July 16, 2003

NewsWithViews.com

While you've been focusing on how the ubiquitous "they" are moving to
take away your guns, you may have been missing the effort to take
away
your â?¦vitamins.

I kid you not. At the rate it's going, before too long, vitamins will
have been deemed almost as dangerous as your .38.

The pharmaceutical industry just can't abide the billions you're
spending on vitamins and supplements. They want a piece of the
action.
When you opt for SAMe instead of Prozac, it costs them money. When
you
decide vitamin C is a low-cost, side-effect-free option for treatment
or prevention of stomach ulcers, gastric cancer, cardiovascular
disease, cataracts, asthma, heavy metal toxicity, high cholesterol
and
blood pressure* (the list goes on) they lose money .

Something must done. Something IS being done!

Maybe you've noticed the uptick in frequency of news stories that say
"Supplements: researchers warn against excessive doses"( The
Oregonian, 7/9/03).

So far we've been warned about : St John's Wort, Vitamin C, Kava,
Ephedra, Creatine and more. Sources will point to the death of
someone
known to have taken a supplement and then pin it on that. Liver
failure? Must've been the Kavaâ?¦remember that scenario?

Cleveland Clinic scientist Dr. Marc Penn, who directed a Lancet study
says taking anything beyond a multivitamin could be dangerous. He
warns of the "unexpected consequences" of taking higher doses of any
vitamin. I always get such a kick out of these guys who warn us about
taking too much vitamin E but don't seem to have a problem with the
fact that over 100,000 people a year in the U.S. die from adverse
drug
reactions - from FDA approved drugs- that is. (And those are just the
folks who succumbed in a hospital. The statistic is much higher if
you
include all those who got sick and died at home from drug reactions.)
The government's RDA for vitamin C is a puny 90 mg a day for an adult
male.

Researcher Linus Pauling proved that 200 milligrams is good, but 5
GRAMS is better! That's thousands of times the "RDA" and there are no
side effects (save maybe a touch of diarrhea). Try doing THAT with a
pharmaceutical.

You'd be dead. Still, the federally-funded anti-vitamin "studies"
keep
coming. Last week we got a dose of just how scary vitamin E can be.

With the deficit running as high as it is, kinda makes you say
"hmmmmmm, wonder why the feds are spending all our money on these
'vitamins are bad' studies?"

I'll let you in on a little secret. One you won't hear reported on
the
nightly news. The push is on to bring the United States into
compliance with what our friends across the pond are doing.

The E.U. cooked up something called the "Directive On Supplements"
which is a template for regulating vitamins.

It's because of something called CODEX ALIMENTARIUS. It's a scheme
devised in 1962 by two U.N. organizations (The Food and Agriculture
Organization {FAO} and The World Health Organization {WHO} ). It's
touted as "an international mechanism for promoting the health and
economic interests of consumersâ?¦" The insidious work is done by
committees in member countries, including our own.

The website for the U.S. Codex Commission warns: "This is the only
official website of the Codex Commission. Unofficial websites using
similar domain names exist". They say that because if you type in
"Codex" you'll get a lot of internet sites that will tell you things
they'd rather you didn't know. Simply put, Codex would require the US
(because we're members of WHO, for starters) to "standardize' vitamin
and mineral supplements. So that here in the U.S. we wouldn't have
supplements with higher levels of vitamins or minerals than the folks
in Europe, for instance. It seems the same organization (WHO) - on a
mission to make the world smoke-free-(for a healthier world populace)
is simultaneously pushing to curb the widespread use of known, health-

supporting, natural remedies.

The U.S. Codex proposal says that only doctors or health
professionals
should "advise" on the use of supplements. Would this mean
prescription-only vitamins and supplements? Sounds like a good way to
cut the medical/pharmaceutical cartel in on the deal. You'll be
encouraged to swallow the Codex line on "safety", as well. The
argument will be that now you, the consumer can be assured of "safe",
"effective" "standardized" ingredients.

Want my advice? Don't think you'll never live in a country that
regulates which vitamins you can take. It's headed that way. Remember
I told you so when you glance at the next news headline about how
such
and such vitamin is a health threat or has been "proven" to be
ineffective. In the meantime, call your U.S. representatives and tell
them it's time to disembowel CODEX ALIMENTARIUS.

You'll feel better in the morning.

------- End of forwarded message -------
-- "Your Rights Are Your Security.
He Who Demands Your Rights
Aims To Take Your Security
-- vetzine01@sbcglobal.net -- http://vetzine.blogspot.com/
Speak Up For Freedom Of Speech