 |
|
I Give Myself Permission to Drive
A citizen was pulled over by a police officer one day in America. The officer asked for his "driver's license" and the citizen gave him a hand written card that said, "I give myself permission to drive.". The officer was confused and called in to his lieutenant with the story. His lieutenant told him to let the man go on his way.
Many police officers know of the right to travel. Many do not. Those that do not: suggest they call a superior officer. That may not send you on your way either. Accept the ticket or submit to arrest. At this point you would begin the trial process for vindication. At some point in a free America, you should achieve justice, either at trial or appeal.
Is America free today in the Police State of America? That is what we are continually fighting for isn't it? To be free?
Below is an example of a self issued drivers license.
COMMON LAW VEHICULAR JUDICIAL NOTICE CONSTITUTIONAL DRIVERS LICENSE
THE UNDERSIGNED Common Law Citizen__________________: hereby Certifies, by Rights
Secured under provisions of the Constitution of the United States of America, the Constitution of the several
states. Common Law, Nature and Laws of Natures GOD, that these Rights are retained in FEE SIMPLE
ABSOLUTE, and held and protected with special regard to Rights designated and/or set forth as follows: ALSO
NOTE Rights and Property are ONE AND THE SAME THING-by the Honorable Justice LOUIS BRANDIS U.S.
SUPREME COURT. NOTICE AND ADVISORY OF RIGHTS CLAIMED INVIOLATE:
1) The Right to TRAVEL FREELY, UNENCUMBERED, and UNFETTERED is guaranteed as a RIGHT and not a
mere privilege. That the Right to TRAVEL is such a BASIC RIGHT it does NOT even need to be mentioned for it
is SELF-evident by Common Sense that the Right to TRAVEL is a BASIC CONCOMMITANT of a FREE Society
to come and go from length and breath FREELY UNENCUMBERED and UNFETTERED distinguishes the
characteristic required for a FREE PEOPLE TO EXIST IN FACT. Please See SHAPIRO vs. THOMSON, 394 U.
S. 618 . Further, the Right to TRAVEL by private conveyance for private purposes upon the Common way can
NOT BE INFRINGED. No license or permission is required for TRAVEL when such TRAVEL IS NOT for the
purpose of (COMMERCIAL] PROFIT OR GAIN on the open highways operating under license IN COMMERCE.
The above named Common Law Citizen listed IS NOT OPERATING IN COMMERCE and as such is thereby
EXEMPTED FROM THE REQUIREMENT OF A LICENSE AS SUCH. Further, the
___________________ state, is FORBIDDEN BY LAW from converting a BASIC RIGHT into a
PRIVILEGE and requiring a LICENSE and or a FEE CHARGED for the exercise of the BASIC RIGHT. Please
SEE MURDOCKvs. PENNSYLVANIA, 319 U.S. 105, and if________________, state does
ERRONIOUSLY convert BASIC RIGHTS into PRIVILEGES and require a License or FEE a Citizen may
IGNORE THE LICENSE OR FEE WITH TOTAL IMMUNITY FOR SUCH EXERCISE OF A BASIC RIGHT. Please
see Schuttlesworth vs. BIRMINGHAM, ALABAMA, 373 U.S. 262. Now if a Citizen exercises a BASIC RIGHT and
a Law of ANY state is to the contrary of such exercise of that BASIC RIGHT, the said supposed Law of ANY
state is a FICTION OF LAW and 100% TOTALLY UNCONSTITUTIONAL and NO COURTS ARE BOUND TO
UPHOLD IT AND NO Citizen is REQUIRED TO OBEY SUCH UNCONSTITUTIONAL LAW OR LICENSE
REQUIREMENT. Please see MARBURY vs. MADISON, 5 U.S. 137 (1803), which has never been overturned in
over 194 years, see Shephard's Citations. Now further, if a Citizen relies in good faith on the advice of Counsel
and or on the Decisions of the UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT that Citizen has a PERFECT DEFENSE to
the element of WILLFULNESS and since the burden of proof of said WILLFULNESS is on the Prosecution to
prove beyond a REASONABLE DOUBT, said task or burden being totally impossible to specifically perform there
is NO CAUSE OF ACTION FOR WHICH RELIEF MAY BE GRANTED BY A COURT OF LAW. Please see U.S.
vs. Bishop 412 U.S. 346 . OBVIOUSLY THERE IS NO LAWFUL CHARGE AGAINST EXERCISING A BASIC
Right to TRAVEL for a regular Common Law Citizen NOT IN COMMERCE on the common way Public
HIGHWAY. THAT IS THE LAW!!! The above named Citizen IS IMMUNE FROM ANY CHARGE TO THE
CONTRARY AND ANY PARTY MAKING SUCH CHARGE SHOULD BE DULY WARNED OF THE TORT OF
TRESPASS!!! YOU ARE TRESPASSING ON THIS Common Law Citizen!!!
2) The original and Judicial jurisdiction of the United States Supreme Court is ALL actions in which a State may
be party, thru subdivision, political or trust. This includes ALL state approved subdivisions and/or
INCORPORATED Cities, Townships, Municipalities, and Villages, EtAI. Please see Article 3, Section 2, Para. (1)
and (2), U.S. Constitution.
3) The undersigned has NEVER willingly and knowingly entered into ANY Contract or Contractual agreement
giving up ANY Constitutional Rights which are secured by the CONSTITUTION, the SUPREME LAW OF THE
LAND. This Common Law Citizen has NOT harmed any party, has NOT threatened any party, and that includes
has NOT threatened or caused any endangerment to the safety or well being of any party and would leave any
claimant otherwise to their strictest proofs otherwise IN A COURT OF LAW. The above named Citizen is merely
exercising the BASIC RIGHT TO TRAVEL UNENCUMBERED and UNFETTERED on the Common public way or
highway, which is their RIGHT TO SO DO!!! Please see Zobel vs. Williams, 457 U.S. 55, held the RIGHT TO
TRAVEL is Constitutionally PROTECTED!!
4) Conversion of the RIGHT TO TRAVEL into a PRIVILEGE and or CRIME is A FRAUD and is in clear and direct
conflict with she UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION, THE SUPREME LAW OF THE LAND. LAWS made by any
state, which are clearly in direct CONFLICT or REPUGNANCY are UNCONSTITUTIONAL and are NOT WITH
STANDING IN LAW AND ARE BEING CHALLENGED AS SUCH HERE AND THEREBY ARE NULL AND VOID
OF LAW ON THEIR FACE. NO COURTS ARE BOUND TO UPHOLD SUCH FICTIONS OF LAW AND NO
Citizen is bound to obey such a FICTION OF LAW. SUCH REGULATION OR LAW OPERATES AS A MERE
NULLITY OR FICTION OF LAW AS IF IT NEVER EXISTED IN LAW. No CITIZEN IS BOUND TO OBEY SUCH
UNCONSTITUTIONAL LAW!!!!!
5) The payment for a privilege requires a benefit to be received As the RIGHT TO TRAVEL is already secured it
is clearly unlawful to cite any charges without direct damage to the specific party. Nor may a Citizen be charged
with an offense for the exercise of a CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT, in this case the RIGHT TO TRAVEL. Please
see Miller vs. UNITED STATES 230 F2d 486. Nor may a Citizen be denied DUE PROCESS OF LAW or EQUAL
PROTECTION UNDER THE LAW.
6) The undersigned does hereby claim, declare, and certify ANY AND ALL their CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS
INVIOLATE from GOD and secured in THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION and the CONSTITUTION OF
THE state wherein they abode as a SOVEREIGN, COMMON LAW CITIZEN existing and acting entirely AT THE
COMMON LAW, and retains ALL BASIC RIGHTS under the CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF
AMERICA, NATURE AND NATURE'S GOD AND UNDER THE LAWS OF GOD THE SUPREME LAW GIVER.
7) ANY VIOLATOR OF THE ABOVE CONSTRUCTIVE NOTICE AND CLAIM IS CRIMINALLY TRESPASSING
UPON THIS ABOVE NAMED COMMON LAW Citizen and WILL BE PROSECUTED TO THE FULLEST EXTENT
UNDER THE SUPREME LAW OF THE LAND. BE WARNED OF THE TRESPASS AND THE ATTACHED
CAVEATS. ALSO TAKE CONSTRUCTIVE NOTICE, IGNORANCE OF THE LAW IS NOT AN EXCUSE!!
SIGNATURE OF THE ABOVE NOTED Common Law Citizen is signed___________________
WITNESS__________________ Date______
WITNESS___________________ Date______
| Home |
|
Email Rick Stanley at rick@stanley2002.org |