We The People
Constitutional Activism Website
For Liberty in our Lifetime!
"if
we are not part of the solution, then most assuredly,
we are part of the problem. Live free or die!"
Stanley2002.org thanks it's unique visitors.
The Patriot A List To
honor Patriots who do more than talk about standing up to those in
government that are operating outside the law or under color of law
Volunteer Today!
Rick needs your help as all of our campaigns for constitutional freedom
from government need volunteers. Email Rick Stanley at Rick@Stanley2002.org
and tell Rick how you wish to help.
Having been recently
appointed Anti-Money Laundering Officer at my investment firm, I now
have the official, government-sanctioned power to scrutinize our
clients' account activity and report almost anything I deem "suspicious
activity" to the federal government. Be worried, friends be very
worried since every bank, every brokerage house, every financial
institution in the U.S. is required by the Patriot Act to appoint an
AML Officer, enact procedures to combat money-laundering, and file
Suspicious Activity Reports on U.S. citizens.
The Act's definition of a financial institution is disturbingly broad.
It includes dealers in precious metals, stones, or jewels; pawnbrokers;
loan or finance companies; insurance companies; travel agencies;
telegraph companies; sellers of vehicles, including automobiles,
airplanes, and boats. Essentially, it means your financial transactions
are subject to investigation if you purchase an engagement ring, insure
your home, take a vacation or buy a car.
According to the statute, if I simply should have become aware of
suspicious activity and fail to report it, I may have broken the law.
So,
if I have a head cold one day and miss a $5,000 wire transfer on a
client's brokerage statement which is clearly suspicious activity since
this client is a 90-year-old widow living on fixed-income investments,
who has never made a wire transfer in ten years I could be in trouble.
(Don't laugh this applies not just to the AML Officer, but to every
employee in a financial organization in a position to view client
transactions. So, if you make an unusually large deposit at the bank
one day, your teller must report this potential "suspicious activity"
to higher ups or face possible sanctions.)
As AML Officer, I am required to report a client's activity as
suspicious if it merely fails to make business sense or appears to be
without economic purpose. So, if a client transfers $10,000 into his
investment account and breathlessly says "Buy gold stocks!" an hour
after Alan Greenspan and Fox News proclaim "Scientists Prove All Gold
on Earth is Iron Pyrite," I have to turn him in.
If a client is a young school teacher and deposits, say, five $2,000
checks over a period of ten days, she must be questioned about it.
Since this might be perfectly normal for a middle-aged, high-income
surgeon, however, I wouldn't have to question her at all thus
lower-income clients will necessarily suffer more intrusions into their
privacy than those who earn more. By the way, as AML Officer I'm
safe-harbored against violations of privacy laws I may be forced to
commit while adhering to the regulations of the Patriot Act.
It gets worse. As I've noted, clients are to be questioned and then
reported to the feds on Form SAR-SF if I don't like their answers
if their transactions indicate suspicious activity. But it does
not end there I'm also required to be on the lookout for potential tax
evasion (as well as check fraud, embezzlement, theft, identity theft or
mail fraud). So, if a client deposits $1,000 which he states he won by
betting $1,000 on the Super Bowl, and wants to buy his daughter a
Treasury bond with that money, I'm obligated by federal law to rat him
out. Of course, all of this is just the tip of the Patriot Act iceberg;
see, e.g., "Outside View: Patriot Act Problems."
I find this situation repulsive in the extreme. It is Orwell's 1984,
slightly delayed. It will result in a paranoia explosion reminiscent of
Nazi-era Germany. What if the Super Bowl bettor in the above example
later hears from another person that I will probably file an SAR-SF
about his $1,000 deposit? Will he then, out of fear, report it on his
tax return the government's secondary desired end? Or will he just
phone me and say he made "that betting thing" up? Then what do I do?
Will he contact me and beg or threaten me to keep silent? Then what do
I do? What if the bettor is my own father? Then what do I do!?
I'm already an unpaid tax collector for the federal government, since I
prepare my firm's payroll, and now, without my consent, I'm also its
unpaid law enforcement agent and informant. I can only wonder,
fearfully, what comes next?
Andrew S. Fischer is a controller for an investment advisory firm in
Pennsylvania.