---

BUSH'S WAR OF TERROR, COVER UP

http://www.newswithviews.com/Spingola/deanna23.htm
PART 9


Deanna Spingola
October 25, 2005
NewsWithViews.com

On 9/11, one plane, one crash would have been outrageous and should have raised
big red flags ? but four consecutive crashes with no timely military
responses and no government accountability. There were procedure failures on
9/11 that could only have occurred if there was complicity from the highest
levels of government. ?No one in government has been reprimanded or even
scolded for what we are told was the greatest intelligence failure in U.S.
history. In fact, the very agencies which failed the nation watched their
budgets increase dramatically, and some of the officials ostensibly at fault
were actually promoted.?[1]

?Normal FAA procedures for responding to even minor deviations from air
traffic control protocols were followed routinely and without complication 67
times between September 2000 and June 2001 before a new convoluted order were
released by the Pentagon on 1 June 2001.[2] That order inserted the Secretary
of Defense into the decision-making and action protocol, normally the domain of
senior military commanders. Why??[3] It was then up to Donald Rumsfeld to
issue an appropriate response to the hijackings.[4] This drastic change played
a significant part in the normal emergency responses during the extremely
distracting and confusing war game exercises scheduled by several government
agencies on the morning of 11 September 2001.[5]

What of the war games that were being conducted the morning of 9/11? We heard
nothing about them on the nightly news. Joseph Paul Göebbels, Nazi Propaganda
Minister said the following: ?Not every item of news should be published.
Rather must those who control news policies endeavor to make every item of news
serve a certain purpose.?[6]

Years of umbilical-like attention to friendly faces reading fair and balanced
words from the teleprompter make it easy for us to initially reject, then
accept and ultimately embrace ?the news?. Bush said: ?If you are not with
us, then you are with the terrorists.? Bush and his minions claim to be
genuine patriots. So either we support their words and actions or we are
vilified as unpatriotic. Skeptics are ridiculed, discredited or worse.

?Totalitarians prefer that we make no distinction between love of country and
loyalty to leaders. They want us to believe that dissension is unpatriotic. In
truth, opposition to corruption in government is the highest obligation of
patriotism.?[7] Right now you might assert that I am a paranoid conspiracy
theorist who may even sport a foil cone on my head. Fine ? your choice, but
rejecting evidence in favor of inactivity will not save you or anyone else from
the consequences. If one concedes that there might actually be a nefarious group
in control of our government demands some responsible attention. It requires
leaving that ever so cozy comfort zone. But just on the off chance that we
citizens grow suspicious and vigilant ? we have been warned against believing
in such conspiracies by none other than George W. Bush who delivered a speech at
the United Nations on 10 November 2001 that included the following:

?Let us never tolerate outrageous conspiracy theories concerning the attacks
of September the 11th; malicious lies that attempt to shift the blame away from
the terrorists, themselves, away from the guilty.?[8] Decide which of the 9/11
theories is hardest to swallow ? the government?s or the many credible
efforts of outside investigators and analysts? Which terrorists are we to
blame?

Our commander in chief feels no accountability to those who put him in office:
?I'm the commander in chief, see, I don't need to explain, I do not need to
explain why I say things. That's the interesting part about being president.
Maybe somebody needs to explain to me why they say something, but I don't feel
like I owe anybody an explanation.?[9] ?If this were a dictatorship, it'd
be a heck of a lot easier, just so long as I'm the dictator.? President
George W. Bush, CNN.com, 18 December 2000.[10] This must have been a real issue
with ?W? as he repeated it often: ?You don't get everything you want. A
dictatorship would be a lot easier.? Governing Magazine 7/98 ?A
dictatorship would be a heck of a lot easier, there's no question about it.?
?W? Business Week, July 30, 2001

We hired them with our votes ? they are supposed to represent us ? not
implement their own questionable agenda. Super egomaniacs forget the source of
their authority while pilfering even greater power.

I dislike quoting Hitler yet it is so appropriate. He said: ?But it was not
until the War that it became evident what immense results could be obtained by
a correct application of propaganda.?[11]

Hitler said: ?By contrast, the war propaganda of the English and Americans was
psychologically sound. By representing the Germans to their own people as
barbarians and Huns, they prepared the individual soldier for the terrors of
war, and thus helped to preserve him from disappointments. After this, the most
terrible weapon that was used against him seemed only to confirm what his
propagandists had told him; it likewise reinforced his faith in the truth of
his government's assertions, while on the other hand it increased his rage and
hatred against the vile enemy For the cruel effects of the weapon, whose use by
the enemy he now came to know, gradually came to confirm for him the
?Hunnish? brutality of the barbarous enemy, which he had heard all about;
and it never dawned on him for a moment that his own weapons possibly, if not
probably, might be even more terrible in their effects.?[12] Read about the
depleted uranium that our government uses on Iraqi civilians.

Our current wars and occupation in Afghanistan and Iraq are the result of the
Bush and company?s response to the events of 9/11. Hitler continues: ?The
propagandist inculcates his doctrine among the masses, with the idea of
preparing them for the time when this doctrine will triumph, through the body
of combatant members which he has formed from those followers who have given
proof of the necessary ability and will-power to carry the struggle to
victory.? There is nothing quite like a converted obedient Bushite to
perpetuate the persistent propaganda that killing the ordinary citizens of
another country in the name of democracy promotes peace and security for
America. War generates death for the vanquished as well as the invaders while
generating major money for the big weapons cartel. For decades the
neo-conservative war hawks, who now serve in the current administration, have
viewed an ongoing war in the Middle East as a means of creating a global
empire.

So despite our eagerness for closure, every crime demands an exhaustive
investigation and thoughtful analysis by the most qualified, skilled
individuals. Two people who, if uninvolved, should have been the first to
demand a full examination of the crimes resisted all investigative attempts.
Both Bush and Cheney contacted the now former Senate Majority Leader Tom
Daschle after 9/11 to insist on strict limitations in any investigation into
the attacks.[13] ?Newsweek reported on February 4, 2002, that Vice President
Cheney called Sen. Tom Daschle (D-SD) to ?warn? him not to open hearings
into the attacks. If Daschle pressed the issue, Cheney ?implied he would risk
being accused of interfering with the mission? against terrorism.?[14]

On 27 Nov 2002, 411 days after the attacks, Bush finally relented to the
entreaties from victim?s families and bipartisan members of congress and
agreed to form an investigatory commission. After more than a year of stalling,
President Bush and Vice President Cheney finally consented to a so-called
independent commission to investigate 9/11 as long as they could pick the
chairman. On that day Bush appointed the grand master of deception and misuse
of government power, instigator of covert operations and manipulating keeper of
state secrets ? Henry Kissinger, to head the investigation. A man that has
been repeatedly investigated for his surreptitious activities and tried for war
crimes was now called to head the investigation of one of the biggest crimes in
America. This significant choice reveals more about Bush and Cheney than
anything else. ?With Kissinger's appointment, Bush rendered the independent
commission a sham. How unfortunate. The public would be better served and the
victims of 9/11 better honored by no commission rather than one headed by
Kissinger.?[15] He wisely resigned a few weeks later over conflicts of
interest.[16] He was replaced by Thomas Kean,[17] member of the Council on
Foreign Relations, in December 2002.[18] Phillip Zelikow was the highly
controversial Executive Staff Director for the commission.[19]

Indications of Kissinger?s New World Order loyalties are discovered in the
following statements: ?Today Americans would be outraged if U.N. troops
entered Los Angeles to restore order; tomorrow they will be grateful. This is
especially true if they were told there was an outside threat from beyond,
whether real or promulgated, that threatened our very existence. It is then
that all peoples of the world will plead with world leaders to deliver them
from this evil. The one thing every man fears is the unknown. When presented
with this scenario, individual rights will be willingly relinquished for the
guarantee of their well being granted to them by their world government.?
--Henry Kissinger was speaking at Evian, France, May 21, 1992 Bilderberg
meeting. Unbeknownst to Kissinger, his speech was taped by a Swiss delegate to
the meeting.[20]

The Commission?s initial budget for the biggest crime in America was a mere $3
million as compared to the $50 million for the investigation of the Columbia
space shuttle. It cost $40 million to investigate the soap opera sexual
escapades of Bill Clinton and Monica Lewinsky. The 9/11 Commission was finally
awarded another $11 million before the report finally became available in the
third week of July 2004.

Even after consenting to an investigation, Bush and Cheney initially stonewalled
the commission in the following ways:

  a.. Refused to allow National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice to testify.

  b.. White House tried to limit Bush's testimony to one hour.

  c.. White House withheld about 75 percent of almost 11,000 pages of Clinton
records pertaining to the investigation of the terrorist attacks. This
information was held at the National Archives.

  d.. They demanded that Bush and Cheney not be forced to testify under oath.

  e.. Bush and Cheney demanded to be allowed to testify together.

  f.. After months of negotiation, Bush finally allowed only four members of the
commission to view only 24 of the 360 PDBs dating back to 1998; ?White House
counsel Alberto Gonzales permitted them to see just 24.?

  g.. The Bush administration attempted to discredit members of the commission,
especially Jamie Gorelick.[21]
The Commission seemed determined not to blame anyone for the failures on that
day. The entire day was full of disasters: many forewarnings were ignored.
There were several war games in process: Vigilant Guardian, Vigilant Warrior,
Northern Guardian and Northern Vigilance.[22] One war game scenario included
hijacked planes flying into buildings. This is interesting considering
Condoleezza Rice, under oath, stated to the commission on 8 April 2004 that
?the White House didn't anticipate hijacked planes being used as weapons.?
In March 2000, she also said: ?We need a common enemy to unite us.? On 13
April 2004 Bush said: ?Nobody in our government, at least, and I don't think
the prior government, could envision flying airplanes into buildings on such a
massive scale.?[23] Obviously, someone in the government must have imagined
it. What an incredible confusing bizarre coincidence to have genuine hijackings
on the same day.

In fact others imagined it also: ?A different fictional treatment of the use
of a ?war game? to perpetrate covert objectives was described in The Lone
Gunmen, a television show aired on Fox TV (owned by CFR member Rupert Murdoch)
in March 2001. In that show, a small cabal within the military-industrial
complex used a war game scenario as cover for remote control hijacking of a
commercial flight and crashing it into the World Trade Center in order to boost
military spending for the permanent war. This show was so close to the most
likely scenario for 9/11 that it is plausible that this information was
deliberately leaked in order to discredit the idea as merely part of a bad
television drama, thereby inoculating people from contemplating the probability
that 9/11 was a covert operation using remote controlled planes under the guise
of a war game.?[24]

On 12 September 2001, George W. Bush met with his national security team and
then quickly assured us that ?The deliberate and deadly attacks which were
carried out yesterday against our country were more than acts of terror. They
were acts of war. This will require our country to unite in steadfast
determination and resolve.? He is manipulatively setting us up for the Iraqi
invasion.

?The federal government and all our agencies are conducting business. But it
is not business as usual. We are operating on a heightened security alert.
America is going forward, and as we do so, we must remain keenly aware of the
threats to our country. Those in authority should take appropriate precautions
to protect our citizens.?

?But we will not allow this enemy to win the war by changing our way of life
or restricting our freedoms.?[25] It is significant as well as deceptive that
he publicly pledges support of our legally guaranteed freedoms while he and his
devoted, but constitutionally compromised subjects in congress covertly attempt
to deprive us of the same. Remember their names in the 2006 elections.

The cover ups and the wars continue as other invasion targets are selected.
However, our personal, God given freedom is the real target.



Part -----> 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8,



Footnotes:

1, Inside Job, Unmasking the 9/11 Conspiracies by Jim Marrs, page xxi
2, The June 1 Order
3, Crossing the Rubicon by Michael C. Ruppert, page 309
4, Criminal Mastermind: Donald Rumsfeld
5, The 911 Stand Down Order
6, Source: Diary, 14 March 1943
7, Freedom force International
8, President Bush Speaks to United Nations
9, Viewer says Bush needs to explain the war
10, Transition of Power: President-Elect Bush Meets With Congressional Leaders
on Capitol Hill
11, Mein Kampf
12, Ibid
13, Bush asks Daschle to limit Sept. 11 probes
14, 9/11 Commission Primer
15, Kissinger's Back, As A 9/11 Truth Seeker
16, Kissinger Resigns Over Conflict of Interests
17, Encyclopedia: Thomas Kean
18, 2004 Council of Foreign Relations Membership Roster
19, Executive Staff Director Phillip Zelikow
20, Quotations Attributed To Henry Kissinger
21, 9/11 Commission Primer
22, 9/11 War Games - No Coincidence
23, President Addresses the Nation in Prime Time Press Conference
24, "War Games" by the US military on 9/11
25, Remarks by the President In Photo Opportunity with the National Security
Team



© 2005 Deanna Spingola - All Rights Reserved


Deanna Spingola has been a quilt designer and is the author of two books. She
has traveled extensively teaching and lecturing on her unique methods. She has
always been an avid reader of non-fiction works designed to educate rather than
entertain. She is active in family history research and lectures on that topic.
Currently she is the director of the local Family History Center. She has a
great interest in politics and the direction of current government policies,
particularly as they relate to the Constitution.

web site: www.spingola.com

email: deanna@spingola.com