We The People
Constitutional Activism Website
For Liberty in our Lifetime!
"if
we are not part of the solution, then most assuredly,
we are part of the problem. Live free or die!"
Stanley2002.org thanks it's unique visitors.
The Patriot A List To
honor Patriots who do more than talk about standing up to those in
government that are operating outside the law or under color of law
Volunteer Today!
Rick needs your help as all of our campaigns for constitutional freedom
from government need volunteers. Email Rick Stanley at Rick@Stanley2002.org
and tell Rick how you wish to help.
The Whole World Knows: 9-11 Controlled Demolition
by Victor Thorn
A recent flurry of
9-11 related material has been making its way into a wide array of
different publications, including the mainstream media. This wave of
information, especially in regard to the World Trade Center controlled
demolition, is proof positive that the truth about this horrific event
is being exposed on a wide scale.
What follows is a sampling
of the venues which are carrying 9-11 news:
• On September 30, 2005,
the NYFD’s incoming Muslim chaplain, Imam Intikab Habib, told Newsday
during an interview that, “He believes something other than al-Qaida
hijackers brought down the World Trade Center.” Habib also added that
he “was skeptical of the official version of the September 11 terrorist
attacks on the World Trade Center,” and that, “I’ve heard professionals
say that nowhere ever in history did a steel building come down with
fire alone.” Furthermore, he elaborated, “It takes two or three weeks
[planning] to demolish a building like that. Was it 19 hijackers who
brought it down, or was it a conspiracy?” Lastly, he conjectured,
“There are so many conflicting reports about it. I don’t believe it was
19 hijackers who did those attacks.” Shortly after making these
statements, Habib was forced to resign as FDNY chaplain before ever
being sworn in.
• In a commentary on the
above interview, Michael Weissenstein of the Associated Press wrote at the end of a September 30, 2005
article (FDNY Chaplain Resigns
after 9/11 Remarks): “Some have
blamed the destruction of the trade center on a U.S. or Israeli plot
designed to whip up support for attacks on Muslim countries.”
• In a follow-up, Newsday
staff writer Patricia Hurtado penned a column on October 1, 2005
entitled September 11 Conspiracy
Theories Abound which had the following quotes:
(a)
“Jimmy Walter, a Santa Barbara, California millionaire, paid $3 million
to run television ads in New York and Los Angeles earlier this year
that suggested the government conspired to blow up the WTC.” (b)
In relation to Walter’s ads about WTC 7: “It was not hit by aircraft.
It had no significant fire… and no explanation for its collapse has
been given.” (c)
“Websites like 911truth.org contend that the twin towers were brought
down by explosives, not hijacked planes.” (d)
Sally Regenhard, founder of the Skyscraper Safety Campaign, on the WTC
towers’ destruction: “It’s unprecedented for a building like that to
have come down.” She added, “The failure to answer questions has
allowed conspiracy theories to flourish. There is a huge and growing
number of people out there who are saying there are too many unanswered
questions.”
• On October 6, 2005, the New York Post entered the fray with Andrea Peyser’s 9/11 Java Jackass. She wrote, “The strikes on the WTC? They
were an ‘inside job’ – either carried out by the United States
government or allowed to occur so we might plunge into war. Or, it was
the mother of all insurance scams. Take your pick.” A few paragraphs
later she interjected this pearl: “Here is a news flash that has been
living under the mainstream radar: The community that believes 9/11 was
a U.S. government plot is large and it is diverse. And it is growing.”
Truer words couldn't be spoken.
Peyser then mentions Jimmy
Walter’s group: “A California outfit called Reopen 9/11 is running TV commercials to raise money –
on NY1. The group contends that the twin towers did not fall because of
fire, but were brought down by U.S. authorities in a kind of controlled
demolition.”
The author then quotes
several patrons at a New York City coffee shop who said, (1) “The Arab
community didn’t benefit from 9/11. It was Bush and Company.” (2) "9/11
is a government-sponsored atrocity.” And finally, a high-school student
(3) “Wesley Sohail, 14, told me kids discuss the 9/11 attacks, and our
government’s culpability, in school … We don’t think they brought the
buildings down. We think they let it happen. He said his teachers
agree.” (Please excuse the student’s LIHOP naïve nature, but at
least he’s on the right path.)
• On the fourth
anniversary of 9-11, Lisa Guliani, Michael Langston, Patriot Jim
Kujawa, Nico Haupt, Vincent Sammartino, members of various 9-11 Truth
organizations, and myself ventured to Ground Zero where we passed-out
literature, DVD’s, and held a huge 14-foot banner which read: 9-11 WORLD TRADE CENTER CONTROLLED
DEMOLITION. Lisa Guliani and I,
along with many others, also held this 14-foot 9-11 WORLD TRADE CENTER CONTROLLED
DEMOLITION in front of the White
House on two different occasions – once during the DC Truth Convergence
in July 2005; and then again in September at the DC anti-war rally
where 250,000-300,000 people were in attendance. Needless to say, our
message got maximum exposure at all these venues!
• In response to our
appearance at Ground Zero, Sarah Ferguson of The Village Voice wrote an article on September 12, 2005
entitled 9-11 Conspiracists
Invade Ground Zero where she wrote
about WING TV: “Her name is Lisa Giuliani and she broadcasts her
theories though a Pennsylvania grassroots video collective called WING
TV. She lectured about how only a series of controlled explosions could
have so rapidly pancaked the twin towers. ‘There's no way jet fuel
could have melted all that steel. It was a free-fall. The concrete was
so thoroughly pulverized, Manhattan was blanketed in dust. Think about
it,’ she urged. ‘Do your homework, please!’” This article also carried
a full-color photograph of our 14-foot Controlled Demolition banner.
• On September 12, 2005, I
wrote an article for WING TV about former auxiliary fireman Paul Isaac
Jr., who told us at the Ground Zero rally, “I know 9-11 was an inside
job. The police know it’s an inside job; and the firemen know it too.”
• In the October 3, 2005
edition of American Free Press, an article entitled Bombs Inside WTC: Fire Officer Says
Firemen, Cops Know Truth by Victor
Thorn was run as the lead article on the front page, with the following
quote: “A 9-11 survivor told this journalist during our protest at
Ground Zero on September 11, 2005 – that emergency radios were buzzing
with information about bombs being detonated inside the World Trade
Center towers.” The AFP also carried an overview by researcher
Vincent Sammartino, which originally appeared on the American Patriot Friends Network: “I just got back from Ground Zero. People
know the truth. Half of the police and firemen were coming up to us and
telling us that they knew 9-11 was an inside job.”
• During the October 6,
2005 broadcast of C-SPAN’s Washington
Journal, the host discussed Porter
Goss’ announcement to not pursue CIA accountability in relation to 9-11
intelligence failures. According to researcher Jeff Dahlstrom, this
topic drew quite a bit of reaction: “Six or seven callers got on [the
air] claiming that 9/11 was an inside job and that WTC 1, WTC 2, and
WTC 7 were brought down by explosives as a controlled demolition. They
wanted the government that failed or caused 9/11 to all be held
accountable. THIS IS MAINSTREAM EXPOSURE TO THE TRUTH.”
• On September 11, 2005, Al-Mihwar TV hosted Egyptian military expert General
Muhammed Khalaf, who spoke of WTC 7: “You can see footage of the tower
collapsing of its own accord, and the dust emitted from its side has
nothing to do with it. It was detonated.”
• Free Market News, a business and technology publication
which was purchased by the worldwide media magnate Bertelsmann Group in
2001, reported on October 10, 2005: “Recent Internet reports have
government officials admitting to a controlled demolition of this tower
[WTC 7] – a decision apparently made on the scene. Such an implosion
would certainly testify to the efficiency of government first
responders in that large buildings usually take days or even weeks to
wire for explosives, not hours.” The article also mentioned “gigantic
explosions throughout the World Trade towers just before they went
down” and “the ‘controlled’ manner in which the Towers collapsed.”
• In the October 10, 2005
edition of American Free Press, Christopher Bollyn interviewed Jimmy
Walter from Amsterdam, with the following headline declaring: $1 Million Reward Offered to Prove No
Explosives Used in WTC Collapse.”
According to Walter: “It is proven that the towers collapsed at very
close to free fall speed, perhaps faster since there is air resistance
to consider. It is impossible for the floors to have been crushed and
fall faster than free fall or slightly slower.”
• On the September 23,
2005 broadcast of Vyzygoth’s From
the Grassy Knoll radio show,
Sergeant Matthew Tartaglia, a highly decorated rescue worker and
fire-fighter who was present on the morning of 9-11 when the WTC towers
collapsed, revealed the following information: “I do not believe those
buildings fell due to the airplanes. I believe those buildings fell as
a result of a controlled demolition.” He continued by saying that due
to his past training, he had witnessed over 20 controlled demolitions
during his lifetime, and that, in regard to the World Trade Center
towers, “If that wasn’t a demolition, I don’t know what it was. That
wasn’t anything other than a controlled demolition.”
• Also, consider the
recent revelations of former Bush cabinet member Morgan Reynolds, whose
June 9, 2005 blockbuster article, Why
Did the Trade Center Skyscrapers Collapse, confronts a plethora of inconsistencies
in the government’s ‘official’ version of events. “Professional
demolition … can explain all of these facts and more. Demolition means
placing explosives throughout a building, and detonating them in
sequence to weaken ‘the structure so it collapses or folds in upon
itself’. In conventional demolitions gravity does most of the work,
although it probably did a minority on 9/11, so heavily were the towers
honeycombed with explosives.”
• Lastly, Kevin Ryan, a
site manager at the Environmental Health Laboratories (a division of
Underwriters Laboratories) was fired from his post on November 18, 2004
after speaking out about how fire could not have destroyed the World
Trade Center towers. In a follow-up to his original letter to Doctor
Gayle at NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology), Ryan
confirms his earlier beliefs (June 9, 2005). “Anyone who honestly looks
at the evidence has difficulty finding anything in the official story
of 9/11 that is believable. It’s not just one or two strange twists or
holes in the story; the whole thing is bogus from start to end.”
Numerous other examples
could be provided at this time (such as David Ray Griffin’s May 7, 2005
speech on C-SPAN), but I feel the preponderance of coverage listed
above speaks volumes as to how prevalently the World Trade Center
controlled demolitions is becoming in our media. Plus, rather than
simply lurking in the alternative press, the venues represented above
cover a broad spectrum, including mainstream television and newspapers.
In simplest terms, they're BUSTED! The only question now is: how can we
bring these guilty parties ... the bloodthirsty psychopaths ... to
justice?